Robert Rhor “Everything Belongs”
As I have read this book, amidst many comments there are a few in particular that have engaged my imagination. It makes me wonder what it would look like for a group of people to commit to living such a way.
1. Return to the Sacred
It begins with the transition from chapter five to chapter six comming out of the idea that we can learn from our fears and anxiety instead of having to fix them, Rhor makes the statement,
” For me, the utter powerlessness of God is that God forgives. I hold myself in a position of power by not forgiving myself or others. God does not hold on to that position of power. God seems to be ready to surrender divine power. God forgives the world for being broken and poor. God forgives us for not being all that we thought we had to be and even what God wanted us to be. ”
Instead it seems that we want to live in positions of power and status quo. It seems that Jesus was more of a prophet that challenged the status quo of how christians might live in deconstruction of the “norm”. “Cheap religion teaches us how to live successfully in a sick system. ” Rhor challenges us to interrupt the way things are and instead of living in an unjust and corrupt environment learning to” accommodate ourselves to a world based on power, prestige, and passions”. We should let go and re shuffle out of normalcy. This might look like what the scriptures teach about dieing to ourself. Instead of our ego leading us we would allow God to move out of our fear, out of normalcy, and into “scared space”. Rhor mentions that this will fell like suffering, letting go of what we are used to isn’t easy. It is a place where “opposites collide and unite, and everything belongs”. He continues with the idea that here “secular becomes sacred” and one is not faced with living the dichotomy of two worlds. He illustrates this with the tearing of the temple curtain. Jesus died and “for those who learn to see” the sacred and secular were no longer separated and “there is only one world, and its the supernatural one”. He later continues talking about letting go and allowing the spirit to work the detachment of our egos and its needs and accomplishments delighting in and moving toward nonpower, nonaggression, nondomination, nonwealth, and nonsucess of the american shadow. Can we imagine being happy without our money, our many options, and substituting freedom of choice for the freedom of the soul?
Yet “God sees the divine image in you”, and “God judges us by our true inner nature, which is always kept whole in him, safe and sound forever…in his judgment I saw him assign no whit of blame to us.” Julian of Norwich
So if the work of the spirit is often detachment we may find the work of the soul is attachment. When the tension of these collide the dance between the two Rhor calls “the Third Way”. This is a way that stands between not fighting to take on, or fixing, or rearranging the world. Nor is it running denying the problem. There is a contemplative stance realizing we “see the dark side of reality and the pain of the world, but we hold it until it transforms us, knowing that we are complicit in the evil and also complicit in the holiness”. This is the “place of grace where newness comes. Creativity comes from here, and we can finally do a new thing for the world”.
Could we, do we dare, can we move toward such a place?
If we could would our neighborhoods, cities, world be the same place?
This is my poor attempt to summarize my take away, which I hope would catch your interest to read this book and/or discuss this Third Way.